tagline

THIS IS NOT A POLITICAL BLOG BUT A BLOG FOR A BETTER MALAYSIA!

Wednesday, August 11, 2010

Chua: Bekas MB Johor dalang kain rentang PKR dengan potret Sultan Johor

http://media1.malaysiakini.com/278/d9b4815d7838a0a866bdb5071e68194f.jpg
Datuk Chua Jui Meng kata ini kerja orang UMNO untuk menjatuhkan namanya di Johor. UMNO pula kata ini kerja PKR. Adakah PKR terlalu bodoh untuk bermain api dengan Istana? Anda baca dan nilai sendiri siapa yang bercakap benar dan siapa yang bermain kotor...

*******************************

Pengerusi Perhubungan PKR Johor, Datuk Chua Jui Meng berkata kain rentang yang memaparkan gambarnya dan Sultan Johor sengaja dinaikkan untuk menimbulkan kemurkaan sultan terhadap parti pembangkang itu.

Menuru
t Chua, kain rentang lain yang seumpama itu juga dikesan sepanjang laluan 'Kembara Mahkota Johor' di mana baginda sendiri terbabit dengan menunggang motosikalnya.

Katanya, kerja pihak tidak bertanggungjawab itu juga mencetuskan kemurkaan sultan dengan dakwaan bahawa beliau adalah calon PKR sebagai menteri besar Johor.

"Mereka berniat membuat sultan dan orang Melayu marah dengan PKR, Ketua Pembangkang, Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim dan diri saya.”

Chua berkata demikian kepada wartawan di Bukit Damansara, Kuala Lumpur selepas memberi kenyataanya kepada seorang pegawai kanan polis di ibu pejabat polis Batu Pahat.
"Beliau merakamkan kenyataan saya berhubung kain rentang itu. Katanya, adalah jelas bahawa saya hanya seorang saksi. Beliau memberitahu 40 laporan polis telah dibuat berhubung kain rentang itu.

“Saya juga membuat laporan dengannya berhubung kain rentang itu dan juga mengenai ceramah Pakatan di Rengit yang dihalang oleh FRU dan polis.”
Sementara itu, Suara Keadilan.com melaporkan Chua juga mendakwa kain rentang provokatif itu dicetak di sebuah premis di bandaraya Johor Baharu.

"Nama bekas menteri besar itu ada disebut di dalam maklumat yang saya terima. Nampaknya dia cuba untuk menjadi jaguh dan cuba untuk memulihkan imejnya yang satu ketika dulu tercemar kerana terlibat dalam krisis dengan Raja-Raja Melayu sehingga imuniti Raja-Raja Melayu dihapuskan.

"Suatu ketika dulu, dia pernah tidak dialu-alukan untuk hadir ke istana sewaktu Almarhum Sultan Iskandar masih hidup. Chua Jui Meng masih tidak lupa, dan masih mempunyai memori yang kuat. Jadi, tak masuk akal kalau dia meminta saya untuk meminta maaf kepada Tuanku Sultan. Beliaulah orang yang paling lantang mengkritik Sultan," katanya kepada Suara Keadilan.com.

B
ekas menteri persekutuan itu berjumpa dengan polis untuk selama lebih dua jam, daripada 11.30 pagi sehingga jam 2
petang dengan diiringi peguamnya, Sankara Nair.

Chua juga berkata beliau menjelaskan kepada polis berhubung beberapa kesilapan pada kain rentang itu yang membuktikan ia bukan dibuat oleh PKR.

"Saya menafikan PKR terbabit dengan penipuan ini. Hanya Umno mempunyai motif untuk membuat perkara terkutuk seperti ini,” katanya.

http://malaysiakini.com/news/139812

Tuesday, August 10, 2010

Teoh Beng Hock : Nota terakhir disembunyi pihak Pendakwa

PSpekulasi berhubung nota yang didakwa tinggalan daripada Teoh Beng Hock yang merupakan 'bukti terakhir' yang muncul awal bulan lalu, kini meninggalkan pelbagai tandatanya.

Pengerusi DAP Selangor Ean Yong Hian Wah yang juga merupakan majikan kepada bekas pembantu politik itu dakwaan nota itu wujud seawal bulan lalu tetapi hanya disahkan oleh pejabat peguam negara semalam menimbulkan banyak persoalan berbanding jawapan.

"Kenapa berita tersebut keluar daripada pihak Umno secara tiba-tiba, (iaitu) melalui blog dan Utusan (Malaysia) dan bukannya daripada pejabat peguam negara atau daripada Suruhanjaya Pencegahan Rasuah Malaysia (SPRM)?" soalnya.

Kandungan dokumen tersebut yang pertama kali dilaporkan oleh Utusan Malaysia susulan daripada satu sidang akhbar oleh sebuah NGO - Jaringan Melayu Malaysia (JMM).

Pada 24 Julai lalu, dilaporkan JMM menuduh dengan kewujudan 'surat penting' tersebut membuktikan bahawa Teoh - yang berumur 30 tahun ditemui terbunuh selepas menjalani soal siasat Suruhanjaya Pencegahan Rasuah Malaysia (SPRM) pada 16 tahun lalu - adalah disebabkan tekanan yang kuat.

Ketika dihubungi, setiausaha agung JMM Tengku Amaluddin Sani berkata kumpulan itu difahamkan mengenai kewujudan dokumen tersebut "tiga atau empat hari" sebelum ia dilapor oleh media.

"Ia adalah satu perkara yang baik, untuk dijadikan sebagai bahan bukti (dalam inkues). Sekiranya dokumen itu benar, maka ia sesuai (dikemukakan) dalam mahkamah," katanya.

Blog pro-Umno memfokuskan banyak perbincangan mengenai dokumen tersebut dan menuduh peguam Tan Hock Chuan - yang mewakili kerajaan persekutuan - 'menyembunyikan bukti berkenaan.

Bekas ketua pemuda PKR yang berpaling tadah, Ezam Mohd Nor pula meminta polis dan SPRM supaya menyiasat nota itu.

“Saya percaya Ezam juga telah membuat laporan polis berhubung perkara itu,” kata Ean Yong yang juga adalah ADUN Seri Kembangan.

Dokumen yang dpercayai 'nota terakhir' itu dijumpai dua bulan selepas kematian Teoh dan sepatutnya dikemukakan di mahkamah koroner semalam, tetapi ia dicabar oleh peguam keluarga Teoh, Gobind Singh Deo.

Menurut Gobind, ia bercanggah dengan peraturan kerana dokumen itu telah disimpan sehingga pada pagi semalam.

Firma RM250 juta: Saham dipegang bagi pihak Taib Mahmud

http://media1.malaysiakini.com/278/ddcd15fe2261eb1841b1dad03ad28595.gif
Dua dokumen didedahkan di laman web bagi membuktikan hubungan secara langsung antara ketua menteri Sarawak dengan sebuah syarikat hartanah yang berpangkalan di Amerika Syarikat - Sakti International Corporation.

Laporan sesawang Sarawak Report memuat-naikkan perjanjian bertulis oleh lembaga pengarah Sakti bahawa adik beradik Tan Sri Abdul Taib Mahmud dan anak-anaknya akan memegang kepentingan 50 peratus dalam syarikat itu bagi pihaknya.

Perjanjian itu dimeterai tidak lama selepas syarikat itu ditubuhkan pada 1987 dengan laporan meletakkan nilainya pada RM80 juta.

Lima proksi berkenaan adalah adik beradiknya Onn dan Ariff, anak perempuannya, Jamilah dan anak-anak lelakinya, Mahmud dan Sulaiman.

Mengikut perjanjian yang bertarikh 8 April, 1988, sejumlah 1,000 unit saham dikeluarkan. Separuh daripada jumlah itu dipegang oleh lima individu berkenaan sebagai amanah kepada seorang yang dikenali sebagai 'Abdul Taib Mahmud'.

Perjanjian itu mempunyai tiga tandatangani - dipercayai oleh Onn, Ariff (meninggal dunia tiga tahun lalu) dan Mahmud.

“Bukan menjadi rahsia, dalam syarikat milik keluarga Taib, ketua menteri itu sentiasa mengelakkan namanya disenaraikan dalam sebarang dokumen,” kata Sarawak Report semalam.

“Beliau selama ini sering-kali mendakwa selaras dengan jawatannya sebagai ketua menteri, beliau tidak mempunyai kepentingan perniagaan. Adalah jelas, bahawa beliau menubuhkan Sakti International, dengan menggunakan alamat rumahnya sendiri di San Francisco.”

Sakti international memiliki beberapa hartanah penting di bahagian pantai barat Amerika Syarikat. Antaranya termasuk bangunan Abraham Lincoln di Seattle - yang antara lain menempatkan pejabat Biro Siasatan Persekutuan (FBI) dan unit anti pengganas Washington Fusion Centre.

“Sistem berkenaan memastikan bahawa Taib Mahmud memiliki separuh daripada saham-saham itu yang dipegang secara amana untuk dirinya sendiri, manakala yang lain memegang tidak lebih daripada 200 saham,” petik artikel itu.

“Dengan cara ini, beliau menguasai syarikat itu secara langsung dengan berpura-pura tidak memilikinya.”

Laman web itu juga mendedahkan satu lagi dokumen - kenyataan saham tempatan yang dimiliki Sakti yang mesti dikemukakan setiap tahun kepada kerajaan California.

Kenyataan yang difailkan pada 17 Sept, 1987 menamakan Taib, Onn dan Ariff sebagai pengarah Sakti pada masa penubuhannya.

Anak sulungnya, Mahmud (Abu Bekir Taib) dinamakan sebagai ketua pegawai eksekutif, setiausaha dan juga ketua pegawai kewangan syarikat itu.

Ked
ua-dua dokumen itu didedahkan pada perbicaraan mahkamah yang membabitkan Sakti.

Seperti pendedahan empayar hartanah Taib di luar negara, Sarawak Report menggesa ketua menteri itu supaya menjelaskan kekayaan dan bagaimana beliau mendapat dana untuk menguruskan syarikat-syarikat berkenaan.

“Dengan bukti seumpama itu Suruhanjaya Pencegahan Rasuah tidak boleh lagi tidak memperdulikan tuntutan supaya siasatan dilakukan ke atas Raja Sarawak yang berambut putih itu?” akhiri artikel itu.

http://malaysiakini.com/news/139704

Friday, August 6, 2010

SPRM kantoi mereka cipta tuduhan di mahkamah

Inilah bukti komplot2 SPRM terhdap orang yagn tak bersalah. SPRM dimalukan sendiri oleh pegawai2 mereka di Mahkamah. Untuk makluman yang tidak tahu, kes ini tidak dilaporkan di akhbar kerana ianya adalah satu kes yang direkacipta oleh SPRM dan memperbodohkan diri mereka sendiri.

Anda baca dan nilai

************************************************************

by Din Merican
heading to Jalan Duta Court yesterday, Aug 05, 2010
Thursday August 5, 2010 was the fourth and last day of Dato’ Ramli’s Trial in the Summons case. One would have thought that by now the charge made out by the MACC would be clear. One would have thought that the cardinal rule for prosecuting someone is that the charge must be so precise and as clear as daylight, so that the accused is left in no doubt as to what wrong he had committed in order to prepare his defence. However, as events have shown, nothing is clear when it involves the MACC.
Teoh Beng Hock Not Forgotten
One year ago Teoh Beng Hock was found dead. There was confusion why he died. There was confusion why he was brought in and detained by the MACC. Was he under arrest? Was he a suspect? If he was a suspect under custody, the law provided for protection of suspects while under custody. Nobody seems to know. What everybody knew was that his dead body was found outside the Selangor MACC Office. To avoid answering all that complicated questions, the MACC denied he was in their custody. The MACC insisted that Teoh did not die in their office, but that his dead body was found 12 floors down from their office. Yes, 12 floors down, thrown from out of the window of the MACC’s office!
We have NOT FORGOTTEN Teoh Beng Hock
The MACC said Teoh was already released at 6 am but that he chose to hang around and slept on the sofa in the MACC office. Then the MACC said Teoh was just a witness. If Teoh was a witness why did he have to die? What the MACC failed to show was that bit of decency of being honest. Until today Teoh’s  family is till mourning his death. Until today Teoh’ s spirit wants to know why his physical body had to die. Until today Teoh’s spirit is restless and refuse to stop roaming the MACC’s office. Until today, Teoh’s spirit haunts the MACC. It will not go away until there is an answer for his death. What offends Teoh’s spirit, Teoh’s family and all Malaysians is the attempt at cover up.
MACC Antics : Amending Charges, Twisting Evidence and Changing Judges
The antics of the MACC never cease to amaze me as I observe the Trial of Dato’ Ramli Yusuff. It has become a standard operating procedure (SOP) for the MACC to amend the charge when the evidence from the witnesses do not favour them.  So it was in Sabah when they amended the charge twice. They even amended it at the close of the case as a last grasp at the straws when the facts and evidence do not support the charge that they had to prove. And Judge Supang Lian wasn’t amused and dismissed the case without even calling for the defence of Dato’ Ramli. The MACC also amended the charges in KL before Judge M Gunalen. And that again resulted in the good Judge to hold there was a failure by MACC to prove a prima facie case.  In other words, these two Judges would not be party to the MACC’s and AG Gani Patail’s attempt to fix up a case against Dato’ Ramli.

Now they have done it again for Dato’ Ramli’s trial on the Summons charge which started on Monday, August 2, 2010 .They are changing the date of the offence for the charge they have made out against Dato’ Rami. They are doing what they did against Anwar Ibrahim in Sodomy I when it was found out that Tivoli Villas and the wing annexe of PJ Hilton were not constructed at the time of the alleged offence. Fate has a strange way of bringing the lives of these two men to a parallel.
When Anwar Ibrahim was arrested and assaulted by then IGP Rahim Noor, Dato’ Ramli was the Deputy Director CID. He was at that time Musa Hassan’s boss. Dato’ Ramli was the one who prevented Rahim Noor from bludgeoning Anwar further and saving him. Dato’ Ramli was the one who gave medical attention to Anwar. After that incident, charges were fabricated against Anwar and he was convicted. Dato’ Ramli was sent into exile to be Commissioner Sabah and was cold storaged.
Musa Hassan: From Subordinate to Boss
Musa Hassan rose to become IGP overtaking Dato’ Ramli, the man who was once his boss. Despite Dato’ Ramli having given Musa Hassan two promotions, Musa Hassan knew Dato’ Ramli will always remain as a threat and worked tirelessly to bring Dato Ramli down. That is where the scene is today – Musa Hassan is IGP and Ramli sits in the dock as an accused person. But even as they fixed Anwar and botched up, the same is happening in Dato’ Ramli’s case. They just can’t put their act together even when they try to fix people up.
The Case before Justice SM Komathy Suppiah

Nothing could be more comical than to see the confusion in the court as Judge SM Komathy Suppiah heard the evidence of the MACC’s witnesses after the charge was amended to change the time of the offence. Déjà vu of  Anwar’s Sodomy I Trial. Then the MACC brought in company secretary, Misss Mahinder Kaur a/p Teja Singh MAICSA No. 7007064 of MK Secretarial Services to show that Dato’ Ramli was a director of Kinsajaya Sdn Bhd at a particular point of time. Unfortunately for MACC, Mahinder said that as at the date of the Charge, Dato’ Ramli was not yet a director as the Form 49 was only lodged with the Company’s Commission of Malaysia (CCM) much later. Mahinder also startled Judge Komathy when she said that MACC officers asked her to cancel several documents : “ The MACC Officers asked me to do so”.
Earlier on in Dato’ Ramli’s Sabah’s trial, MACC Superintendant Sok One a/l Essen already admitted that he destroyed the piece of paper that he wrote on to record a phone call from a Sabah village headman. In other words, he destroyed evidence. Now in this trial, Mahinder says that MACC asked her to cancel various documents in order that they can use a particular document to support the charge against Dato’ Ramli. As if that wasn’t bad enough, Mahinder then said that the accounts of Kinsajaya showed that it was a company that was bought off the shelf and that it was a dormant company and there was no business activity until today!

That jolted the erudite Judge Komathy to ask “What is the Charge?” What is it that Dato’ Ramli has done wrong? That was the beginning when things started to crumble for the MACC.Indeed, what exactly did Dato’ Ramli violated?
According to the charge, Ramli had breached Reg. 5(1)(a) Peraturan Pegawai Awam Kelakuan dn Tatatertib 1993 (Pindaan 2002) for being involved in “trading” through Kinsajaya. But Mahinder now says that Kinsajaya is dormant and has no activities. In any event, the Peraturan prescribed its own punishment as a departmental breach and not for any punishment under the Penal Code.
Another MACC witness, Mr Lee who is the Deputy Director of Land Survey Dept of Sabah confirmed Mahinder’s evidence and said that no agricultural activity had taken place because the survey has not been completed. In fact, Kinsajaya did not even get the land approved by the State Government what more to carry out any activity or business on the land!
The Comic In Court: MACC IO Wan Abdul Rahman
Things got worse when the star witness, Investigating Officer (IO) Wan Abdul Rahman, was cross examined by the much respected Dato’ Seri Shafee Abdullah. He contradicted the whole charge when he unabashedly admitted that his investigations showed that Kinsajaya was a dormant company and has not carried on any business and even said unequivocally “Kinsajaya tidak ada perniagaan!” after being cornered countless times for his inconsistent answers.
Still bewildered by the slew of questions, the IO even confirmed that his investigation showed that Dato’ Ramli has no involvement in the business of Kinsjaya although he had earlier said that Dato Ramli has committed an offence under section 168 of the Penal Code.

This befuddled IO Wan Abdul Rahman can’t seem to understand that Section 168 which makes it an offence for a civil servant to carry on trading would not, by his own admission, apply to Dato’ Ramli if Dato’ Ramli has no involvement in business and Kinsajaya is a dormant company. “ Its elementary my dear Watson” is what Sherlock Holmes would have said.

With the situation being hopeless, the two DPPs tried to shield him and sought a 15 minutes break. Things did not, however, abate after the break when IO Wan Abdul Rahman became moré incoherent in his answers to the point of being bizzare, contradicting himself at every turn. It became very clear that IO Wan Abdul Rahman was just a foot soldier being sent to the front lines to be shot at. That is what happens when the MACC is used to fix someone.
Tan Sri Bakri Omar’s Letter and the Hidden Hand of Kevin Morais
TanSri MohdBakri Omar
The juicier part was yet to come. Dato’ Shafee then showed him an unsigned letter of approval from then IGP Tan Sri Bakri to Dato’ Ramli. Already there was a KDN letter of approval which this IO could not avoid from admitting. Apparently, Tan Sri Bakri’s letter was in the Prosecution’s bundle. In an attempt to extricate himself, IO Wan Abdul Rahman said that he was IO for this case only whereas that bundle was from Dato’ Ramli’s earlier KL case handled by IO Saiful Ezral. When pressed who could have arranged all this, IO Wan Abdul Rahman pointed the finger at Kevin Morais. So there you have it, Kevin is not just a lying faggot, he is also a fixer! In my previous articles on the Rosli Dahlan Trial, I have already provided clear illustration of Kevin Morais- The Liar Who Got Buried In His Own Lies!
Despite some tension, I felt that all these revelations that unfolded before my eyes were divine. It was heavenly for me, in my pursuit for justice for Dato’ Ramli, as my lovely dear wife, Dr Kamsiah, had attended court with me today for the first time. I enjoyed today’s court proceedings immensely as on the bench was the beautiful Judge SM Komathy Suppiah who was as serene as the statute of justice.
Kudos to DPPs Ahmad Bache and Ahmad Sazilee
I should also mention that unlike my previous experience observing uncouth DPPs like DPP Dzulqarnain, DPP Sophian and that faggot DPP Kevin Morais in Rosli Dahlan’s case, the DPPs in this case were gentlemanly ie Sr DPP Ahmad Bache and his junior DPP Ahmad Sazilee. Their court ethics are commendable.
Sr DPP Ahmad Bache is a credit to the AG Chambers given the difficult task he faced. He displayed admirable advocacy in the truest sense of justice and fairplay. He is  a role model for the younger DPP Ahmad Sazilee of MACC to emulate. I then saw a sight that humbled me. I saw Dato’ Ramli and his close friend and lawyer, Rosli Dahlan, walking up to and shaking the DPPs hands. I heard both Dato’ Ramli and Rosli thanking them for being fair. Two accused persons thanking their prosecutors for being fair. Mind you, these are gestures among decent gentlemen, regardless of what the verdict would be later. Yes, an unusual sight to behold indeed!
I felt so appreciative of their admirable qualities that I just had to walk up to shake their hands. Unlike DPP Dzulqarnain who withdrew his hands upon hearing my name, Din Merican, DPP Ahmad Bache remained as calm as ever and like a good muslim, shook my hands firmly but gently.  I could feel the pulse of an honourable man.
It is such a coincidence that both DPPs should have the name Ahmad, which is Prophet Muhammad’s name in heaven. I could only consider this as a good omen.  It is a good omen because next week, on Monday, Judge Komathy will deliver her decision. Next week, Muslims will start Ramadan.
Rosli Dahlan’s Trial continues in the Holy Month of Ramadhan
Suddenly, I felt sad for Rosli Dahlan because while Monday August 9 will be the end of the last of Dato’ Ramli’s case, Rosli’s fate is still in the balance. His case has not ended since it started in Ramadan of 2007, and there no sign when it would end. When I mentioned to Rosli the coincidence of the two DPPs Ahmad, Rosli agreed with my views and spontaneously recited the Quranic verse which sounded like this: “ Wa ma arsalnaka illa rahmatan lil alamin”. Rosli then explained to me the meaning that it was God’s testament to Muhammad PBUH that he (Muhammad) has not been sent except to be a blessing upon the universe.
I walked away humbled with the thought that in the bog of all these confusions caused by the MACC, there is clarity of mind in one person being accused and unfairly treated by the MACC. That clarity could only have come from an innocent mind!

Thursday, August 5, 2010

Sidang Perak sekadar cop mohor lulus RM80 juta

Jelas Kerajaan BN tidak telus, bagaimana PR boleh meningkatkan pendapatan negeri Perak semasa memerintah tetapi BN pula ingin minta belanjawan tambahan? 5 PBT di Selangor menang Anugerah PBT Terbaik  di Malaysia. MP Klang yang asalnya mempunyai hutang berjuta kini mempunyai hasil pendapatan RM40juta dalam masa setahun PR memerintah Selangor. Simpanan MBPJ pula meningkat dari RM20juta ke RM190Juta di bawah pemerintahan PR. bagaimana ini boleh berlaku? 1 jawapan sahaja iaitu itu 1BN=1Malaysia=1Rasuah!

Ingat! Itu semuanya duit rakyat, amanah daripada rakyat untuk digunakan bagi pembangunan negara bukan untuk projek2 berkepentingan sendiri atau untuk mengkayakan kroni. Insaflah atau anda bakal diinsafkan pada PRU 13! 


Subsidi untuk rakyat dipotong tapi kerajaan BN sendiri tak berjimat. jangan fikir rakyat takde akal. Mereka yg di kampung mengundi BN kerana mereka tidak tahu. Jika mereka tahu, dan kami akan pastikan mereka tahu kisah sebenar, maka BN akan berkubur, ingat amanah rakyat, ingat amanah Allah!


*****************************************************
DAP mahu kerajaan negeri Perak mengemukakan rang undang-undang untuk menetapkan tempoh masa minimum persidangan dewan negeri supaya badan perundangan itu tidak lagi dijadikan sekadar cop mohor atau 'rubber stamp' semata-mata demi memenuhi agenda peribadi sesuatu pihak sahaja.

Setiausaha DAP Perak,, Nga Kor Ming yang juga ADUN Pantai Remis melahirkan perasaan kesal dengan tindakan kerajaan negeri, Selasa lalu yang hanya bersidang setengah hari untuk meluluskan rang undang-undang perbekalan tambahan membabitkan RM80 juta wang rakyat.

“Kerajaan negeri BN juga gagal memberi peluang berbahas yang mencukupi kepada ahli-ahli dewan...adalah tidak masuk akal bahawa persidangan dewan yang begitu penting hanya berlangsung satu hari sahaja,” katanya dalam satu kenyataan.

Dua hari lalu, sidang DUN Perak meluluskan enakmen perbekalan tambahan yang menyaksikan negeri itu mengalami belanjawan defisit yang tinggi RM104 juta.

Nga juga mengutuk keputusan Menteri Besar, Datuk Seri Zamry Kadir yang enggan bersidang empat hari seperti yang diminta oleh Pakatan Rakyat supaya semua ahli dewan diberi peluang untuk berucap.

“Berani kerana benar, takut kerana salah. Jika tidak buat salah, mengapa BN begitu takut mendengar suara rakyat dari Pakatan Rakyat,” katanya.

Menurut Nga, adalah tidak munasabah apabila selaku ketua pembangakang Perak, Menteri Besar yang disingkirkan, Datuk Seri Mohamad Nizar Jamaluddin hanya diberi masa 15 minit oleh speaker, Datuk G Ganesan untuk berucap.

Semua ahli dewan lain pula hanya diberi masa 10 minit di mana amalan kuku besi sedemikian adalah bertentangan dengan prinsip asas sistem demokrasi berparlimen, tegasnya.

“Parlimen mengambil masa 40 hari berdebat untuk meluluskan bajet, tetapi sidang DUN Perak cuma satu hari sahaja, saya percaya ini satu lagi rekod dunia.

“Sepanjang masa persidangan, microphone Pakatan ditutup, media diletak dalam bilik berasingan dan dikurung di atas bangunan seperti akuarium, seluruh dewan dikerumuni oleh anggota polis, kini dewan negeri sudah tidak dapat berfungsi dan demokrasi juga terkubur di Perak berikutan rampasan kuasa,” katanya..

Menurut Nga, konvensyen Parlimen dan amalan biasa, ketua pembangkang sentiasa diberi penghormatan dan masa yang secukupnya untuk berhujah.

Sebagai contoh, katanya Lim Kit Siang pernah berbahas selama lebih 10 jam di Dewan Rakyat ketika beliau menjawat jawatan ketua pembangkang Parlimen tetapi di Perak, ia hanya diperuntukkan 15 minit sahaja.

Persidangan dua hari lalu itu juga menyaksikan Nizar Jamaluddin diusir keluar kerana mahu terus membahaskan rang undang-undang itu meskipun masa hanya 15 minit yang diperuntukkan telah tamat.

Serentak dengan pengusiran itu, semua 27 orang ahli dewan dari Pakatan Rakyat mengambil ketetapan meninggalkan dewan sebagai tanda protes.

Monday, August 2, 2010

[Video] Kekejaman Polis Keganasan FRU

Let the video speaks on its own. Is there still justice and fairness for Malaysians?

Friday, July 30, 2010

Perak Pakatan slams Zambry for record deficit

Zambry was accused of frittering away Perak’s funds and landing the state in the red. — file pic

KUALA LUMPUR, July 29 — Perak Pakatan Rakyat (PR) accused the Barisan Nasional (BN) state government today of recklessly emptying the state’s coffers, claiming Perak was headed towards financial ruin with a record budget deficit of RM104 million this year.

Sitiawan assemblyman Datuk Ngeh Koo Ham slammed the BN state administration for its plan to table a RM80 million supplementary budget during the Perak assembly next Tuesday, saying the request for additional funds only proved the administration’s inefficiency.

The former senior state executive councillor claimed that the BN administration, in its short rule under Mentri Besar Datuk Dr Zambry Abd Kadir, had ruined the hard work of its predecessors.

“PR’s 10-month rule saw Perak’s revenue touch a historic high with an additional RM103 million.

“Ten months of BN’s rule sees Perak facing its highest deficit in history, with RM104 Million in deficit.

“The request by the BN government for an additional RM80 million proves PR governs the state better than the BN,” he claimed in a statement today.


Ngeh cast aspersions on the mentri besar’s financial management.
Ngeh said that before PR helmed the state in 2008, the previous BN government had presented a deficit budget of RM39,998,870 for 2008.
“When we took over, we collected an additional revenue of RM103 million without increasing any form of taxes or charges on the people. Therefore, there was a surplus amount of about RM63 million in 2008,” he said.

He noted that to be prudent, the PR state government presented a budget with a reduced deficit of RM25 million for 2009.

Last year, the new BN government further reduced the deficit to RM23,890,000 when it tabled the 2010 budget.

“But as expect with its corrupt and non-transparent administration, the BN government chalked up additional expenditure and it is now asking the state assembly to approve another RM80 million for its administration.

“In the circumstances, the BN government is expected to register RM103,890,000 in deficit for 2010, which is the highest in Perak history,” he said.

Ngeh alleged that BN had squandered away the state’s revenue on useless frivolities that only benefitted its cronies.

He cited the example of how the Zambry had created posts for three advisors to the state government and one information officer, and allotted them salaries and benefits equivalent to those of the state executive councillors.

The three are former Jalong assemblyman Datuk Chang Ko Youn as advisor for Chinese affairs, former Sungkai assemblyman Datuk S. Veerasingam as advisor for Indian affairs, Batu Kurau assemblyman Captain (rtd) Najmuddin Elias Al-Hafiz as advisor for Islamic affairs, and Pengkalan Baru assemblyman Datuk Hamdi Abu Bakar as the information chief.

“Why does the government need to pay Chang and Veerasingam as state advisors with exco pays and benefits? Is Zambry, the BN mentri besar, admitting that he is not competent to govern the state or is he just trying to benefit BN candidates who have lost in the elections?

“These are public funds and not his personal money,” he said.

Ngeh further accused Zambry of attempting to garner personal support by plastering thousands of promotional posters of him across the state.

“The government also announced [it was] giving RM50,000 to each MCA division. We believe that the government is secretly doing the same for Umno divisions.

“They also wasted state funds to promote the BN government by advertising in the media and sending ‘Teachers’ Day’ cards every teacher,” he claimed.

Ngeh called on Zambry to itemise his proposal for the RM80 million supplementary budget and list down what the money would be used for.

“The people have the right to know the details to ensure that it does not go to dubious projects,” he said.
He also urged the BN government to practice open tenders for government projects and the award timber concessions.

“This has proven to bring in a huge increase of revenue to the state,” he said.

Another former state executive councillor, Nga Kor Ming, said Zambry should resign for his incompetency in handling state funds.

“If he still has some moral values with him and before more damage is done to our beloved state, Zambry should resign and dissolve the assembly,” he said in a statement.

The Pantai Remis assemblyman added that if the assembly approved the supplementary supply bill for RM80 million, Perak’s deficit would reach 14.2 per cent of its budget, which is three times worse than the federal government’s 5.6 per cent and 4.3 times worse than the 3.3 per cent international benchmark fixed by the European Union for sustainable development.

http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/malaysia/article/perak-pakatan-slams-zambry-for-record-deficit/

Monday, July 26, 2010

Apa yang Anwar dan Mahathir ada tetapi Najib tiada

20 tahun lalu, dunia tidak kenal pun Malaysia. Dunia lebih mengenali Thailand kerana Phuketnya dan hiburan waktu malamnya. Tetapi mereka tidak kenal Malaysia.


Ketika zaman Tun Dr Mahathir, beliau telah berjaya mengangkat nama Malaysia sebagai sebuah negara dunia ketiga yang pesat membangun seiring dengan Singapura dan Taiwan. Korea Selatan suatu ketika dulu perada di dalam gelanggang yang sama tetapi hari ini telah jauh lebih maju daripada Malaysia.

Malaysia juga dihormati oleh rakan-rakan negara Islam kerana kelantangan Tun Mahathir bersuara untuk menegakkan hak negara-negara Islam. Malaysia pada waktu itu dihormati dan digeruni kerana ketegasan Perdana Menterinya.

Rakyat pula bangga apabila negara kita dipandang tinggi di kalangan negara-negara Islam. Pergi sahaja ke mana-mana negara Islam lain, sebut sahaja Malaysia dan Dr Mahathir dan semua akan memuji-muji kedua-duanya. Tun Dr Mahathir tegas dan berpegang pada prinsipnya. Salah tetap salah tidak kira Amerika mahupun British. Tun juga pernah melancarkan kempen Buy British last sebelum memperkenalkan Dasar Pandang ke Timur (Jepun).

Semasa pemerintahan Tun Abdullah Badawi, nama Malaysia perlahan-lahan hilang daripada pandangan dunia. Malaysia seolah-olah telah hilang taringnya. Di tambahkan lagi dengan politik dalam negara yang kucar-kacir Tun Abdullah ditekan oleh partinya sendiri untuk melepaskan jawatan Perdana Menteri Malaysia. Sebuah drama yang dilakonkan oleh pemimpin-pemimpin UMNO untuk tontonan seluruh rakyat Malaysia. Cuma satu yang tidak disangka-sangka, DS Anwar Ibrahim dibebaskan ketika Tun Abdullah menjadi Perdana Menteri.

DS Najib pula merupakan tokoh paling layak menggantikan Tun Abdullah kerana BN tiada calon lain yang lebih berkredibiliti. Malangnya, Najib telah dikaitkan dengan banyak skandal yang mencemarkan reputasinya sehingga ke peringkat antarabangsa. Malaysia terus tenggelam daripada pandangan dunia. Hinggakan Najib terpaksa mengupah penasihat-penasihat asing dengan bayaran jutaan RM semata-mata untuk memperbaiki imej beliau dan Malaysia di mata dunia. Satu perkara yang tidak perlu dilakukan oleh PM-PM sebelumnya.

Najib tidak dihormati seperti mana Tun Mahathir semasa pemerintahannya. Dunia tak kenal Najib, tetapi dunia lebih kenal Anwar Ibrahim. Dahulu kehadiran Tun Mahathir sentiasa dinantikan di forum-forum antarabangsa tetapi tidak bagi Najib. Dunia tidak melihat kredibiliti Najib untuk melayakkan beliau bersuara bagi pihak dunia ketiga mahupun negara-negara Islam. Tetapi Anwar lebih mendapat penghormatan di peringkat antarabangsa. Pelbagai jemputan diterima untuk berucap di forum dan seminar antarabangsa. Suatu yang lama telah hilang selepas peninggalan Tun Dr Mahathir.

Anwar dilihat mampu menaiikan semula imej Malaysia di mata dunia andai beliau berpeluang meneraju negara. Beliau dicaci dinegaranya sendiri tetapi dihormati di peringkat antarabangsa. Beliau dijemput membentangkan pelbagai kertas kerja di peringkat antarabangsa yang mana Najib tidak pernah diberi peluang untuk melakukannya. Najib sebenarnya jauh dari hati rakyat jika dibandingkan dengan Tun Abdullah yang lebih people friendly. Najib sukar didekati sedangkan Tun Abdullah pergi menemui dan melihat sendiri kesusahan rakyat.

Anwar dan Tun Mahathir dihormati dunia kerana kepintaran mereka menghurai isu-isu semasa. Pandangan yangg tegas dan bernas. Tepat percaturan Tun Mahathir ketika membawa Anwar masuk ke dalam UMNO.

Hari ini Malaysia perlu bangkit! Kita perlukan pemimpin yang mampu menaikkan martabat negara. pemimpin yang berani, bersih, tegas, amanah dan beragama! Jika dibanding Anwar dan Najib, jauh perbezaannya. Jika tidak kerana skandal liwatnya Anwar hari ini telah mamacu Malaysia jauh kehadapan untuk terus bersuara untuk negara-negara dunia ketiga dan dunia Islam dengan penuh ketegasan.

Rakyat impikan reputasi Malaysia yang dulu. Yang Tun Mahthir telah berjaya berikan kepada negara. Kita tidak boleh sekadar berkokok di Malaysia sahaja. Kita tak perlukan jaguh kampung lagi. Malaysia perlu menjadi suara dunia! atau kita akan terus ketinggalan... yang dikejar tak dapat, yang dikendong keciciran. Yang ruginya negara dan rakyat! Yang untungnya pemimpin yang memanipulasi kekayaan menggunakan kuasa di tangan.

TIba masanya untuk kita bermuhasabah, ke mana hala tuju kita? Apa hak-hak kita? Bagaimana kita boleh bersuara? Bagaimana hendak menegakkan hak dan keadilan di Malaysia? dan juga bagaimana kita sebagai rakyat mampu membantu melonjakkan semula nama Malaysia? Pilihan ada di tangan kita. Buatlah pilihan yang tepat demi masa depan negara. Mencuri itu salah disisi Islam, apatah lagi mengambil hak yang bukan miliknya. Seperti juga riba itu haram dan dilarang keras di dalam Al-Quran tetapi mengapa kita masih mengamalkannya?

Tepuk dada tanya selera.Hak kita untuk bersuara! Undilah untuk kebenaran, undilah untuk ketelusan dan undilah untuk kebaikan rakyat keseluruhannya! Ingat! Yang salah tetap salah, yang benar pasti terserlah!

Thursday, July 22, 2010

PM tabur RM50k untuk dapat liputan akhbar Amerika

http://media1.malaysiakini.com/274/be408e645e6d0be9e3168730cdc1f071.jpg
Perdana Menteri, Datuk Seri Najib Razak membayar sebuah firma perunding politik yang berpangkalan di Washington, RM50,000 (US$15,000) untuk membantunya memastikan rencana pendapat pengarang yang ditulisnya diterbitkan di akhbar-akhbar utama di Amerika Syarikat.

Dan sekiranya, hasil tulisannya itu disiarkan, maka perdana menteri akan mengeluarkan bayaran tambahan RM50,000 sebagai habuan untuk 'yuran kejayaan' kepada perunding berkenaan.

Perkara ini didedahkan menerusi dokumen yang difailkan di bawah Akta Pendaftaran Agen Asing oleh firma Quinn Gillespie & Associates (QGA), sebuah badan perunding perhubungan awam dan pelobi yang terkemuka di Washington DC.

Menurut dokumen yang diperolehi oleh Malaysiakini, QGA diberi tugas oleh sebuah lagi firma perunding, Kumpulan The Laurus, bagi cuba menyakinkan akhbar utama di Amerika bagi menyiarkan artikel Najib.
Kumpulan The Laurus, sebuah firma perhubungan awam yang diragui dengan laman webnya yang masih dalam pembinaan - juga diberikan tanggungjawab mengendalikan perkhidmatan perhubungan awam ketika lawatan seminggu Najib ke Washington DC dan New York dari 10 hingga 16 April tahun ini.
Najib, yang diiringi oleh isterinya, Datin Seri Rosmah Mansor berjumpa dengan Presiden Amerika, Barack Obama pada 12 April lalu di Washington.
Pasangan itu kemudiannya berlepas ke New York bagi upacara penyampaian Anugerah Keamanan dan Harmoni Antarabangsa 2010 kepada Rosmah. Majlis gilang gemilang dan jamuan gala itu turut dihadiri oleh bintang-bintang Hollywood.
'Yuran tak dikembalikan'
Pada surat perjanjian bertarikh 14 April antara dua firma perunding itu – QGA dan Laurus – dinyatakan QGA 'akan membekalkan perkhidmatan perhubungan awam dan media bagi pihak kerajaan Malaysia berhubung penyiaran rencana pendapat pengarang yang dihasilkan oleh perdana menteri Malaysia'.

Menurut perjanjian itu lagi, Laurus akan membayar QGA 'yuran US$15,000 yang tidak boleh dikembalikan sepanjang tempoh bermula 14 April, 2010 dan berakhir pada 20 April, 2010'.

'Sekiranya QGA berjaya menempatkan rencana itu di penerbitan media utama, Laurus akan membayar QGA yuran kejayaan US$15,000. Yuran itu mesti dijelaskan dalam tempoh 30 hari selepas artikel berkenaan disiarkan'.

Perjanjian itu bagaimanapun tidak menyebut akhbar-akhbar utama yang mana tulisan pendapat Najib itu sepatutnya disiarkan.

Semakan dengan beberapa akhbar utama Amerika - Washington Post, New York Times dan Wall Street Journal – menunjukkan tiada rencana pendapat seumpama itu disiarkan.

Na
mun, Washington Times – sebuah akhbar yang dibiayai oleh pemimpin Gereja Unification, Sun Myung Moon – ada menerbitkan lampiran mengenai Malaysia, sehari sebelum Najib melawat ibu negara Amerika itu.

Yang menarik, pejabat kedua-dua Laurus dan QGA terletak di tingkat yang sama di sebuah bangunan di Connecticut Avenue. Washington, DC.

Kumpulan The Laurus juga dipercayai terbabit dengan iklan dua halaman kontroversial di New York Times yang mengucapkan tahniah kepada Rosmah kerana menerima anugerah keamanan tersebut.

source: http://malaysiakini.com/news/138091

Tuesday, July 20, 2010

Kelantan Sultan ambushed by special ops cops [video]


By Ken Vin Lek, Free Malaysia Today
KUALA LUMPUR: A video showing the Sultan of Kelantan, Tuanku Ismail Petra Sultan Yahya Petra’s being ambushed by armed balaclava-clad special operations force personnel has been obtained by FMT.
The short video clip, which was recorded by the sultan’s personal bodyguard, showed the sultan leaving their royal palace in an entourage of vehicles heading towards the airport in a Toyota Alphard.

Just after the sultan left the palace gate, a white police car, a Proton Perdana, came between the sultan’s car and that of the personal bodyguard.

As they were driving along, the entourage came to a standstill when the sultan was ambushed by cars from all sides of the road (1.10 minutes elapsed).

A grey Proton Waja is seen on the left while a silver Honda CRV on the right, all of which were carrying armed balaclava-clad special force personnel.

The police came out of their respective vehicles, pointing their guns at the sultan’s car and his personal bodyguard.





http://www.malaysia-today.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=33231:kelantan-sultan-ambushed-by-special-ops-cops-video-&catid=19:newscommentaries&Itemid=100131